I'm having an interesting discussion with Ron Shandler of Baseball HQ and Greg Ambrosius of the NFBC concerning the number of team in AL and NL only next season.
I know it is a dying breed, but have any of you thought about what you are going to do?
My initial thought is both being 12 team leagues but adding a 24th roster spot that can be a pitcher or a hitter.
In terms of overall player pool penetration:
NOW
AL - 79%
NL - 78% (assumes 10 pitchers)
WITH HOUSTON and 24th swingman spot - 77%
ONLY FORMATS NEXT SEASON WITH HOUSTON MOVING
ONLY FORMATS NEXT SEASON WITH HOUSTON MOVING
Catchers are like prostate exams -- comes a time where you can't put if off any longer, so you may as well get it over with and take it up the butt - The Forum Funklord
I'd rather be wrong for the right reasons than right for the wrong reasons - The Forum Funklord
Always remember, never forget, never say always or never. - The Forum Funklord
You know you have to seek therapy when you see one of your pitchers had a bad night and it takes you 15 minutes to find the team you have him on. - The Forum Funklord
I'd rather be wrong for the right reasons than right for the wrong reasons - The Forum Funklord
Always remember, never forget, never say always or never. - The Forum Funklord
You know you have to seek therapy when you see one of your pitchers had a bad night and it takes you 15 minutes to find the team you have him on. - The Forum Funklord
Re: ONLY FORMATS NEXT SEASON WITH HOUSTON MOVING
Well I think it depends on the league - rules/rosters/keeper or redraft
For the NFFC I would think it best for them to just leave as is - not a big enough deal either way so why get some knickers in a knot with a change
For private leagues aside from league parameters above it depends on the owner's collective attitudes and what you would have to do.
In my ten team AL keeper league (deeper than many eleven or even some twelve team leagues because of a minor league draft each year and deep farm rosters plus three man reserve list) this was discussed last spring and the majority of that league leaned towards adding a second UT or swingman over expanding (although that may well have been driven by protectionist concerns)
For the NFFC I would think it best for them to just leave as is - not a big enough deal either way so why get some knickers in a knot with a change
For private leagues aside from league parameters above it depends on the owner's collective attitudes and what you would have to do.
In my ten team AL keeper league (deeper than many eleven or even some twelve team leagues because of a minor league draft each year and deep farm rosters plus three man reserve list) this was discussed last spring and the majority of that league leaned towards adding a second UT or swingman over expanding (although that may well have been driven by protectionist concerns)
Re: ONLY FORMATS NEXT SEASON WITH HOUSTON MOVING
I don't think you can have a 13-team NL only league with 15 team NL teams unless you drop an OF and go with 9P.
Catchers are like prostate exams -- comes a time where you can't put if off any longer, so you may as well get it over with and take it up the butt - The Forum Funklord
I'd rather be wrong for the right reasons than right for the wrong reasons - The Forum Funklord
Always remember, never forget, never say always or never. - The Forum Funklord
You know you have to seek therapy when you see one of your pitchers had a bad night and it takes you 15 minutes to find the team you have him on. - The Forum Funklord
I'd rather be wrong for the right reasons than right for the wrong reasons - The Forum Funklord
Always remember, never forget, never say always or never. - The Forum Funklord
You know you have to seek therapy when you see one of your pitchers had a bad night and it takes you 15 minutes to find the team you have him on. - The Forum Funklord
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: January 3rd, 2009, 12:09 am
Re: ONLY FORMATS NEXT SEASON WITH HOUSTON MOVING
For us? Status quo - keep the 23 man rosters the same for both our 11 team AL only and 11 team NL only. We'll call Houston a "bonus" to our AL league and not that much of a loss to our NL - and if we go back to 12 teams in either of our leagues? Same thing. No modifications. As my brother says to our football league when they complain our championships come in week 17 of the season; "Draft better!"
These are my views based on my own opinions and observations - your mileage may vary.
"KNOW THY LEAGUE" - the Forum Funklord - 4/13/2009
Fantasy is managing stats ... roto is managing teams
"KNOW THY LEAGUE" - the Forum Funklord - 4/13/2009
Fantasy is managing stats ... roto is managing teams
Re: ONLY FORMATS NEXT SEASON WITH HOUSTON MOVING
Sorry didn't think NL - they should just drop it to 12 for both leagues and NL should drop the 10th pitcher and they would both be the same thenTodd Zola wrote:I don't think you can have a 13-team NL only league with 15 team NL teams unless you drop an OF and go with 9P.
Re: ONLY FORMATS NEXT SEASON WITH HOUSTON MOVING
I'm a bit behind on my forum reading...our league (11 team AL) has decided the Astro's are simply a bonus. The waiver wire is insanely thin at the best of times, taking another 11 hitters or pitchers out will just deplete things further.