OF in NL-only

Get advice specific to your team. This can be opinions on trades, free agent or waiver pickups, who to start or even just "rate my team". It is helpful if you provide sufficient details regarding your league format and team composition.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
viper
Hall of Famer
Posts: 1475
Joined: December 31st, 2008, 11:32 pm
Preferred Style: Currently in an AL-only league with the Bill James Technical RCA as the single hitting category and ERA as the single pitching category.
Contact:

OF in NL-only

#1 Post by viper »

Standard 5 categories. No bench so this guy will be active.

I have Nieuwenhus. Available are X.Nady and Schierholtz.

Are one of my options a better choice?
The avalanche has started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -- Ambassador Kosh

Mike Ladd
Buffy, the Umpire Slayer

da_big_kid_94
Hall of Famer
Posts: 1574
Joined: January 3rd, 2009, 12:09 am

Re: OF in NL-only

#2 Post by da_big_kid_94 »

I think Nate is your better choice. We own Nady in our NL only and we see he's getting AB's but Ankiel is supposed to be healthy by next week so who knows what goes there? The SF OF is not exactly the personification of an HMO.
These are my views based on my own opinions and observations - your mileage may vary.
"KNOW THY LEAGUE" - the Forum Funklord - 4/13/2009
Fantasy is managing stats ... roto is managing teams

Post Reply