Standard 5 categories. No bench so this guy will be active.
I have Nieuwenhus. Available are X.Nady and Schierholtz.
Are one of my options a better choice?
OF in NL-only
- viper
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: December 31st, 2008, 11:32 pm
- Preferred Style: Currently in an AL-only league with the Bill James Technical RCA as the single hitting category and ERA as the single pitching category.
- Contact:
OF in NL-only
The avalanche has started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -- Ambassador Kosh
Mike Ladd
Buffy, the Umpire Slayer
Mike Ladd
Buffy, the Umpire Slayer
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: January 3rd, 2009, 12:09 am
Re: OF in NL-only
I think Nate is your better choice. We own Nady in our NL only and we see he's getting AB's but Ankiel is supposed to be healthy by next week so who knows what goes there? The SF OF is not exactly the personification of an HMO.
These are my views based on my own opinions and observations - your mileage may vary.
"KNOW THY LEAGUE" - the Forum Funklord - 4/13/2009
Fantasy is managing stats ... roto is managing teams
"KNOW THY LEAGUE" - the Forum Funklord - 4/13/2009
Fantasy is managing stats ... roto is managing teams