15 Catchers draft worthy in a 12 team mixed
-
brooklyn49
- Major League Veteran
- Posts: 152
- Joined: January 1st, 2009, 12:06 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
15 Catchers draft worthy in a 12 team mixed
Looking at the updated projections. For the 12 team mixed league, there are 15 catchers valued at $1 or more. How does one interpret this?
13 Team, Mixed, Rotisserie League with Daily Transactions
525 IP Limit; 60 Games per position
Hitting: Runs, HR, RBI, SB, BA, Hits, BB, Total Bases, OPS
Pitching: W, SV, ERA, WHIP, K's, HR Allowed, Holds, K/BB, QS
Hitting:
C: O. Narváez 1B: P. Goldschmidt 2B: C. Biggio 3B: M. Muncy SS: M. Semien MI: C. Hernández CI: C. Santana OF: M. Conforto, B. Harper, A. McCutchen, T. Edman Utility: N. Cruz
Pitching:
SP: M. Minor, K. Maeda, C. Martínez, N. Pearson, J. Montgomery, C. Bassitt
CL: H. Neris, N. Burdi, A. Bass
SU: P. Báez, Y. Petit, B. Treinen
Bench: E. Thames, N. Solak, T. Grisham, J. Berti
DL: J. Verlander, S. Oberg
525 IP Limit; 60 Games per position
Hitting: Runs, HR, RBI, SB, BA, Hits, BB, Total Bases, OPS
Pitching: W, SV, ERA, WHIP, K's, HR Allowed, Holds, K/BB, QS
Hitting:
C: O. Narváez 1B: P. Goldschmidt 2B: C. Biggio 3B: M. Muncy SS: M. Semien MI: C. Hernández CI: C. Santana OF: M. Conforto, B. Harper, A. McCutchen, T. Edman Utility: N. Cruz
Pitching:
SP: M. Minor, K. Maeda, C. Martínez, N. Pearson, J. Montgomery, C. Bassitt
CL: H. Neris, N. Burdi, A. Bass
SU: P. Báez, Y. Petit, B. Treinen
Bench: E. Thames, N. Solak, T. Grisham, J. Berti
DL: J. Verlander, S. Oberg
Re: 15 Catchers draft worthy in a 12 team mixed
This is talked about in the essay describing the mechanics of the CVRC. It has to do with the marginal pricing algorithm used to size the pool. There are usually a bunch of catchers in the $0 range that should be considered to be $1.
There was a slight error with the file posted last night, there is a new one on the way. In this one, there are 16 >= $1, 6 @ $0, 1 @ -$1 and 1 @ -$2.
The 8 below $1 are fundamentally $1 catchers.
There was a slight error with the file posted last night, there is a new one on the way. In this one, there are 16 >= $1, 6 @ $0, 1 @ -$1 and 1 @ -$2.
The 8 below $1 are fundamentally $1 catchers.